Tuesday, August 5, 2025
22.4 C
London

Busy employment judge rebuked for six-month delay in written judgment

Judge Gary Denis Tobin sanctioned after tribunal party waited more than six months for judgment

A busy employment judge has been formally sanctioned for misconduct after he failed to provide written reasons for his judgment for more than six months—despite a clear request from one of the parties.

Employment Judge Gary Denis Tobin was investigated by the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) following a complaint that written reasons had still not been issued around five months after they were formally requested. When finally received, more than six months had passed.

The JCIO confirmed Tobin accepted responsibility for the delay. He explained that he had delivered a full oral judgment during the tribunal hearing and warned at the time that written reasons could take significant time due to workload pressures. In an attempt to compensate, he read his judgment slowly to allow the parties to take notes.

Nonetheless, the JCIO said Tobin did not provide updates during the delay nor approach his regional employment judge in good time to ask for a deadline extension. The failure to keep the parties informed and to seek assistance was found to breach judicial standards of diligence and care.

In his representations, Tobin cited his “extremely busy workload” and the need to prioritise other pressing work, such as reserved judgments, as justification. He apologised to the complainant and confirmed that the delay caused no direct detriment to the case.

Embed from Getty Images

However, investigators concluded that his conduct amounted to judicial misconduct. “Employment Judge Tobin did not exercise sufficient diligence and care in the discharge of his duties,” the JCIO statement noted. “He failed to keep the parties updated as to the delay and when the written reasons could be expected.”

As a result, the senior president of tribunals—acting on behalf of the Lady Chief Justice and with the Lord Chancellor’s agreement—issued Tobin with formal advice for misconduct. The JCIO described this outcome as a “reasonable and proportionate sanction in this case”.

This is not an isolated instance. The JCIO has already issued six public statements this year related to judicial misconduct stemming from excessive delays in providing judgments, orders, or transcripts. These delays have ranged from five months to nearly three years in extreme cases, highlighting a growing backlog in the tribunal system.

While Tobin’s case did not result in any direct prejudice to the parties, it adds to increasing scrutiny over timeliness and transparency in tribunal proceedings.

Hot this week

Administrators recover just 2% of Pure Legal’s £30m claims book

Creditors face heavy losses as administrators recover just £491k from the failed Pure Legal claims book

Mass litigation ‘could cost UK economy £18bn’, warns new report

Collective litigation boom may deter investment and harm growth sectors, warns ECIPE study

Pérez-llorca and Gómez-Pinzón agree historic merger to enter Colombian market

Pérez-llorca merges with Gómez-Pinzón, forming a powerhouse in Colombia and Latin America

Ex-Dechert lawyer loses seven-figure injury claim over office door handle strike

Judge rules office fire door and handle not “equipment” under Employer’s Liability Act

Make e-wills legal, abolish obsolete rules, law commission tells government

Commission urges overhaul of Victorian wills law to reflect modern tech and protect vulnerable people

Topics

AI set to invade UK courts as government pushes full justice system overhaul

Government unveils sweeping AI plan to transform courts, staff, and case administration

AI is killing Biglaw jobs but it’s great news for malpractice lawyers, says Andrew Yang

Andrew Yang says AI is replacing biglaw juniors—sparking fears of malpractice, not progress.

Barrister busted for quoting fake court cases in shocking legal scandal

Sarah Forey and Haringey Law Centre face a damning high court rebuke after inventing legal precedents.

Is your legal assistant about to be replaced by a robot?

Legal AI tools threaten to disrupt paralegal roles, but experts say humans are far from obsolete.

Fax out, email in: Civil rule reform targets modernised service

Civil Procedure Rule Committee proposes barring solicitors from rejecting email service without a reason

Solicitors and insurers near deal on ‘unbundled services’ definition

Finalised definition of unbundled legal services expected this summer to boost clarity

UK government moves to rein in SEP litigation costs with new IPEC track

UK to consult on new IPEC track to fairly price standard-essential patents amid legal concerns

Judge adds own colourful diagram in high-stakes competition case

Sir Marcus Smith J defends originality with colourful sketch amid KC-stacked court battle
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img