Local Government Lawyers set out their response to the Mazur ruling amid sector-wide disruption
Local Government Lawyers has published a policy statement setting out its strategic response to the legal uncertainty created by the Mazur decision, which has affected how local authorities deploy legal executives and unqualified staff in litigation services.
The organisation said the judgment has had a tangible impact on service delivery, workforce confidence, and long-established models of legal practice within local government. It noted that the consequences are being felt at a time of sustained pressure on public services, increasing the need for clarity and practical solutions.
LLG confirmed that, after considering the legal and policy context, it has decided not to intervene in the Mazur appeal as an interested party. The organisation said local authorities occupy a distinctive position under the Legal Services Act 2007 and that their role in conducting litigation cannot be fully or appropriately resolved through appellate litigation alone.
The policy statement acknowledges a broad consensus across the legal sector that, while the Mazur outcome has produced disruptive consequences for both public and private sectors, the judgment itself represents a credible interpretation of the law. Against that background, LLG said it considers legislative clarification and reform to be the most effective and responsible route forward, rather than seeking to overturn the decision through the courts.
LLG has outlined a phased strategic response to support its members and work towards a sustainable long-term solution. In the immediate term, it will deliver a dedicated webinar for members on managing litigation risk in light of the Mazur ruling. This will focus on local government powers, governance frameworks, and specific legal practice areas. A supporting guidance document will also be issued, setting out practice areas with citations and conclusions to assist authorities in their own assessments.
The organisation also highlighted workforce and employment challenges arising from the decision, including concerns about professional status, career progression and the implications of further qualification requirements for CILEX lawyers. To address these issues, LLG will host a specialist employment-focused webinar in early February, led by advisers from Bevan Brittan, to provide guidance on managing these matters lawfully and sensitively.
LLG said it will closely monitor the Mazur appeal, currently listed for February 2025, and assess its implications once the outcome is known. Depending on the clarity provided by the appeal judgment, the organisation may commission further legal advice focused specifically on the statutory and operational position of local authorities.
Following that analysis, LLG plans to consult extensively with members to identify workable practice models and agree on shared priorities for reform. This will inform engagement with government aimed at securing legislative change that supports efficient and proportionate litigation services while maintaining accessibility and diversity within the legal profession.
LLG said it remains committed to acting as a credible voice for local government lawyers and supporting members through the ongoing period of uncertainty.