Saturday, July 26, 2025
16.1 C
London

Law firm slammed with £173k fine after failing to spot foreign politically exposed client

Taylor Vinters fined for failing to check PEP status during 2017 property purchase

Taylor Vinters LLP, a Cambridge-based law firm now merged with Mishcon de Reya, has been fined nearly £173,000 by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) for failing to carry out crucial checks on a foreign client identified as a politically exposed person (PEP) during a 2017 residential property transaction.

The SRA found that the firm breached money laundering regulations by neglecting to obtain senior management approval before establishing a business relationship with the client. Taylor Vinters also failed to determine the source of the client’s wealth and funds and did not implement adequate monitoring during the course of the relationship.

Under the regulations in force at the time, any firm dealing with a non-domestic PEP was obligated to apply enhanced due diligence. Despite this, Taylor Vinters did not realise the client’s PEP status until two months after the property deal was completed.

In a particularly troubling lapse, the firm had previously supplied incorrect information to another firm involved in the transaction, stating that the buyer’s identity had been verified—when in fact, it had not.

Taylor Vinters admitted its failings, including non-compliance with anti-money laundering legislation and poor internal governance. The SRA emphasised that firms have a duty to provide accurate information and to protect the public from the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing.

“The failure to follow proper due diligence exposes firms to serious regulatory and criminal risks,” the SRA said in its ruling. “It is in the public interest that legal practices ensure strict compliance with the money laundering regulations.”

Embed from Getty Images

The initial fine was calculated at around £247,000, but this was reduced to £172,934 to reflect the firm’s early admission of wrongdoing and full cooperation with the SRA’s investigation. The regulator also noted that Taylor Vinters did not financially benefit from the breach.

Because Taylor Vinters operated as an alternative business structure, the SRA had the authority to exceed its typical £25,000 fining limit. Alongside the fine, the firm must pay £1,350 in investigation costs.

Responding to the decision, a spokesperson for Mishcon de Reya said: “The SRA has announced a fine against Taylor Vinters relating to errors made in 2017 under their legacy systems. We are pleased the SRA reduced its basic fine to account for early admissions and full cooperation with the investigation.”

This is not the first time Taylor Vinters has found itself penalised for similar issues. In 2020, the firm accepted a £20,000 fine following a regulatory settlement agreement over failures in due diligence involving multiple foreign investor clients. On that occasion, it admitted to four breaches of anti-money laundering rules.

The SRA continues to intensify its scrutiny of firms that fall short in complying with AML protocols, particularly when politically exposed clients are involved. PEPs—often linked to public functions in foreign jurisdictions—are considered higher risk because of their potential connection to corruption or illicit finance.

This latest ruling stands as a stark reminder that legal practices must identify and monitor PEPs diligently. Failure to do so could expose firms not only to large financial penalties but to reputational damage that lasts long after the case is closed.

Hot this week

Administrators recover just 2% of Pure Legal’s £30m claims book

Creditors face heavy losses as administrators recover just £491k from the failed Pure Legal claims book

Mass litigation ‘could cost UK economy £18bn’, warns new report

Collective litigation boom may deter investment and harm growth sectors, warns ECIPE study

Pérez-llorca and Gómez-Pinzón agree historic merger to enter Colombian market

Pérez-llorca merges with Gómez-Pinzón, forming a powerhouse in Colombia and Latin America

Ex-Dechert lawyer loses seven-figure injury claim over office door handle strike

Judge rules office fire door and handle not “equipment” under Employer’s Liability Act

Make e-wills legal, abolish obsolete rules, law commission tells government

Commission urges overhaul of Victorian wills law to reflect modern tech and protect vulnerable people

Topics

Fax out, email in: Civil rule reform targets modernised service

Civil Procedure Rule Committee proposes barring solicitors from rejecting email service without a reason

Solicitors and insurers near deal on ‘unbundled services’ definition

Finalised definition of unbundled legal services expected this summer to boost clarity

UK government moves to rein in SEP litigation costs with new IPEC track

UK to consult on new IPEC track to fairly price standard-essential patents amid legal concerns

Judge adds own colourful diagram in high-stakes competition case

Sir Marcus Smith J defends originality with colourful sketch amid KC-stacked court battle

Freshfields to pay trainees £20k to study AI, crypto and cyber law before joining firm

Freshfields will sponsor future trainees to study tech law at KCL—plus a £20k living grant

City law firms told: Ditch the stereotypes or lose Gen Z talent!

Senior associate and paralegal-psychotherapist urge law firms to truly support the next generation

Judges blast legal AI misuse: ‘ChatGPT isn’t your junior counsel!’

Judges spare junior lawyers over fake case citations—but issue warning over AI misuse in legal work

Gen AI sparks revolution in legal workflows and client expectations

LexisNexis report reveals how European law firms are preparing for Gen AI’s impact on legal work
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img